Search results

i don't really see what commanding presence or rallying surge would do for him then, but i guess that's a tangent. i personally still don't really think it qualifies, but i don't think it'd break anything if you allowed it.

yeah, but...couldn't you just shout?

i don't really interpret telepathy as seeing or hearing, more just information popping up in your brain, so i'd say no. that said, i can't think of a use case where this would be particularly useful anyway, so it feels like a slightly redundant question to me,

wrong. EDIT: also "improved divine smite" is a bit of a misnomer, because it's not actually part of smite. it just gives you a flat 1d8 bonus radiant damage to any melee weapon attack you make.

wrong - that would be 7 attacks (2 from extra attack, 2 from action surge, 1 from haste, 2 from unleash incarnation since you take 2 attack actions). for however many more turns as you have unleash incarnation it'd be 4 attacks, and then it'd be 3 until haste ends. that goes up to 8, 5, and 4...

because it's broader then that, yeah.

it says "negative effect", so yes, it would be any negative effect, not just conditions.

but this isn't for your part. it's for the purposes of discussion - and for the purposes of discussion, it's absolutely important to note whether something is first or third party, even if people who worked on the core books worked on said third party product, because of the status that being...

i mean, i won't dispute that. whether it is or not isn't particularly relevant. it's not helpful to bring up third party content when discussing first party content, because it isn't first party content. it was also kind of strange because...well, bringing up third party content wasn't even...

well, we were discussing balance. not so helpful to bring up third party content when discussing the balance of first party (well, for level up anyway) content.

why are you even grabbing third party content for your example? tyrannized -> scars gives you a resistance too, and that's in the AG alongside the dragonborn.

a5e has some rules for characters leaving retirement. you could, theoretically, make the master the same approximate power level as the apprentice and then use rules in that sort of vein to represent the additional experience of the master.

it's page 175.

tl;dr: the bandwagon fallacy is a FALLACY for a reason

i mean...you want to supplement 5e, not replace it, right? replacing most of the character options seems to go against that goal to me.

98 is WILD

well. i think that's a sentence that's never been spoken before.

the subclass/prestige class change alone would require rewriting all the subclasses at minimum, and most likely the base classes as well. removing absolute abilities would require a similar overhaul.

the banneret's features (aside from at level 7) hinge off of the fighter's base class features. you thus cannot use those banneret features if you use your class resources normally - you instead need to wait until you can trigger the riders to make use of those features. this concern exists for...